Skip to main content

Data Collection and Knowledge Sharing – the Ethics of Knowing and Sharing

 


Image free of copyright restrictions, downloaded from Pinback button reading Teach the Children the Truth | Smithsonian Institution (si.edu)


By reading Decolonizing Methodologies I have reflected on the concept of research from different angles. Ethics is the dominant theme in the book and plenty of insights are offered in regard to the application of research methodologies.

Before understanding what academic writing implies, I much relied on presenting a topic with a one-way approach which would support my ideas. During the past two years, we have been confronted with an abundant flows of fake news, mis-information and conspiracy theories which seem to have something in common, a mono-directional perspective, pushing themselves forward in order to prevail over other streams.

But what’s the effect of this modality of information sharing? The impactful resonance of imposing one view only is that it may significantly influence, or better diminish, the reasoning of those who do not engage into a thorough analysis and comparison between facts, taking for granted written words and relying on limited resources. Basically, it’s about triggering analysis skills or numb them.

How do I filter the data I collect? How do I select data when collecting it? I had never thought thoroughly about the importance of being neutral in collecting data, and how difficult it can be as a researcher. How can we discern our background from the way how we act, or when we research? Are we biased at priori in collecting data? If so, how can we neutralize the effect of our choices on people we research on?

Collected data can write an although biased truth, like history books. For example, looking at history, women were not eligible for decision-making roles within societal structures, therefore this has implied we have received a partial knowledge, an exclusive truth.

The word truth is often associated with knowledge and justice, when it actually has to do with power, accessibility, authorship. Knowing the truth sets the foundation of our identity, however our identity is shaped through the construction of the most powerful presence dictating the truth.

Accessing vast amounts of literature through my University makes me feel a privileged learner, likely to be one of the few receiving education in a Western World, where the concept of truth has been built over layers of knowledge hegemony and discriminating practices.

In this sense, I have the hard task of de-colonizing, de-constructing and re-building this knowledge basing my new learning on several other sources, new skills of analysis, data comparison, synthesis, neutral knowledge sharing. This requires an abundant seeking spirit!

Considering the amount of appropriated practices such as massage, rituals, herbs, traditions, clothes, which originally belonged to various indigenous people, but been reinvented and institutionalized by the imperialist mentality owners, it can be observed research methodologies and dissemination of knowledge can have a much larger catastrophic effect. These methodologies reflect a total absence of respect towards the occupied inhabitants of other lands.

Thinking of the now popular vegan diet which may propose fruits and vegetables that are planted in lands where indigenous rights are sacrificed to the altar of a globalized culture, neglecting the ethical sponsorship of the original meat-free way of living.

Our way of researching is embedded in a defined socio-cultural context that enact as a bias towards the subject of the research. This can be said of research carried out by large scale organizations or Governments that produce data to which masses would refer to as trusted sources and build informed knowledge upon.

As a person who has always refused to dig into politics, I must start to understand more about expressing my political statement by writing, dancing, acting in society, etc. Do these action imply a political statement anyway? What does political mean? How does it relate to knowing, information sharing?

One quote I take away from reading Decolonizing Methodologies is ‘‘Thus the work of the liminal perspective is to reveal the ways that dominant perspectives distort the realities of the other in an effort to maintain power relations that continue to disadvantage those who are locked out of the mainstream.’’ (Gloria Ladson-Billings, cited, p. 204)

 

Tuhiwai Smith, Linda, Decolonizing Methodologies (2016) Available online Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples - Linda Tuhiwai Smith - Google Books [Accessed June 2021]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FAST FORWARD

Last week we had a really great conversation over Skype. I was introduce to so many new concepts about research methodologies. As I am trying to find a new rhythm between daily life and studying, I am attracted by different resources available but feeling disorientated at the same time. During our discussion, something that resonated with my learning experience was the term ‘’kinesthetic empathy’’. This reminded me of kinesphere, used by R. Laban to refer to the Space surrounding an individual and used to map human movement through observing how the Body moves through Scales of Movement. I found, according to Theodor Lipps’ theory of ‘Einfühlung’ (Lipps, 1851-1914) ’kinesthetic empathy’’ occurs ‘‘When observing a body in motion, such as an acrobat, spectators could experience an ‘inner mimesis’, where they felt as if they were enacting the actions they were observing*. ’’ This concept made me question about the functionality of the Greek theatre catharsis. Catharsis was first c...

Chaos as fundamental tool for learning processes

I felt lost in the flow of concepts and abstract thought exchange at our last Sunday's discussion.  This confusion was relevant for my process of learning. Ongoing uncertainty and lack of solid answers are giving me the chance to ask questions and find their intrinsic value in the context of my whole experience as a learner, as the book 'Knowing knowledge' suggests. I had already made a conclusion and firm point to myself of what information, knowledge, learning and doing represent for me, I thought. The conversation took me to unchartered waters where I reiterated my tendency to like structures and organized content delivery. Knowledge can be a trap if you codify your language and you manage to interact with others truly by means of that code.  Knowledge without empathy leads you to intellectual elitism and intellectual elitism is the antithesis of culture dissemination.  The process of learning is taking me to sharpen my tools of communication, whereas the empathic abil...

WorDs in progress

  Getting used to selecting the right hashtags on social media to catch the right audience, has possibly helped me locate a few subjects for my AOLs today.  It may take a multi-perspective analysis to ponder over and select the right words or labels that define your practice. At least for me it takes time, reflection and learning. During our first Zoom call yesterday, we talked about our practice.  As a visual learner, and not a fun of public speaking, I tend to simplify my thoughts by jotting bullet points before it's my turn to speak. Thanks to time constriction, I quickly managed to summarize key concepts depicting my current practice and future areas of focus.  What is my practice? This is probably the reason why I am taking the MAPP. Since I have welcomed the opportunity to gain new insights on experiential learning , I have been trying to absorb every single notion about this subject, learning from self-reflection, re-evaluate reflective conclusions based on ne...